Video: 3-Steps to Resolving Construction Delay Disputes
The video discusses the three steps to managing construction delay disputes: analyzing the risk, selecting the right analysis method, and preparing a thorough and concise presentation.
Key Highlights:
- Analyzing the risk: Before pursuing dispute resolution, it is crucial to thoroughly analyze the value of the claim, considering factors such as extra work, loss of productivity, and preparation costs. This analysis helps determine the net claim value and the potential impact on relationships and focus within the organization.
- Selecting the right analysis method: Different types of delay analysis, such as total time, adjusted as-built, and contemporaneous time frame analysis, have their own strengths and weaknesses. It is essential to choose the most appropriate method based on the project’s characteristics and the availability of accurate as-built information.
- Preparing a thorough presentation: When presenting a delay claim, it is essential to be thorough and accurate, providing all relevant information and addressing each issue individually. Keeping the presentation simple helps maintain clarity, while flexibility allows for a fair and objective evaluation of the claim.
- Challenges in scheduling specifications: Public works contracts often lack expertise in critical path scheduling, leading to difficulties in enforcing rigorous scheduling specifications. Regular meetings and involvement in the scheduling process can help ensure contractors’ compliance and improve the quality of schedules submitted.
